"This is reassuring news for couplesconsidering assisted conception, their subsequent children, fertility specialists and for the widerpublic health," said the investigators.Results of the study were presented today at the annual meeting of ESHRE by Dr CarrieWilliams from the Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK.This was a large population-based linkage study between the Human Fertilisation & EmbryologyAuthority (HFEA, the UK's regulatory authority for ART clinics) and the UK's National Registryof Childhood Tumours (NRCT).(1) The HFEA records of all 106,381 children born afterassisted conception in the UK from 1992 to 2008 were linked to NRCT records to calculatethe number of children who subsequently developed cancer. Once the databases were linked,cancer rates in the ART cohort were compared with population rates, whilst stratifying forpotential mediating factors including birth weight, multiple births, treatment type and infertilitycause.
The average duration of follow up was 6.6 years.Results showed that there was no overall increased risk of cancer in ART children bornthroughout the 17-year study period. Overall, 108 cancers were identified in the ART children,which was comparable with the 109.7 cases which would have been expected from generalpopulation figures.However, increased risks were found for the development of certain rare cancer types, thoughthese findings were based on small numbers and the absolute excess risks were small. Forinstance, significantly more children developed hepatic tumours than expected (6 vs. 1.83),which translated to an added excess risk of 5.94 per million person-years.
This excess risk wasalso associated with a low birth weight.However, none of the children born after assisted conception who did develop cancer wererecorded as having a co-morbidity consistent with an imprinting disorder. This again, said theinvestigators, is reassuring. The possibility of an increased cancer risk in ART children has beensuggested by the discovery of altered epigenetic patterns in embryos.(2)Commenting on the results, the study's principal investigator, Associate Professor AlastairSutcliffe from the Institute of Child Health in London, said: "This is the largest study of its kindto be reported and is unique in that the data are derived from a single country and in ahomogeneous population.
The absence of cancer in children - or in adults - can be considered ameasure of long-term health resilience, so we are happy to report that in the country whereIVF was first successfully applied there is no convincing evidence that ART children are at anygreater risk of cancer than those naturally conceived."It is true that we found increased risks of a few rare cancers, but these would need to bestudied across large international datasets to confirm if they were genuine findings or just aneffect of their very rareness."
Professor Sutcliffe described the overall study results as a "useful bellwether" [guide} for thehealth of ART children, and future studies will address other unresolved questions over thesafety of IVF for mothers and their children.A similar though smaller study reported at this congress produced comparable findings.(3) TheCoNARTaS cohort study from three Nordic countries also found that children and youngadults born after IVF had no overall increased risk of cancer when compared with children inthe general population.
The study group comprised 92,809 children born after IVF between1982 and 2007 (61,547 singletons and 31,262 multiples), and a matched control group from thegeneral population four times greater in number. Data on perinatal outcomes and cancer wereobtained by linkage to national registries.A cancer diagnosis occurred in 143 children born after IVF (19/1000) and in 626 (18/1000)children in the control group. The most common cancer diagnosis was leukaemia, whichoccurred in 6/1000 children born after IVF and in 5/1000 in the control group.
Source-Eurekalert
No comments:
Post a Comment